Wednesday, September 18, 2013
Inconvenient Facts Involving The Washington Navy Yard Shooting
Charles C. W. Cooke at the National Review offers a piece that counters the comments from gun control advocates following the Washington Navy Yard shooting.
Now that the terrifying confusion has abated and the wildly varying reports have been collated into some sort of consensus, we are able to review what happened yesterday at Washington, D.C.’s Navy Yard with a dispassionate and critical eye.
Doing so reveals that it is once again time for the friends of liberty to be blunt and to be forceful in the face of what will inevitably come. So resolved, let us lay down this marker: Those claiming that yesterday’s abomination demonstrates the need for stricter gun control are lying, or else they are ignorant, and, either way, they should be ashamed of themselves.
It does no such thing.
We now know that the perpetrator owned only a Remington 870 shotgun, and that he murdered and maimed his way into possession of the two other weapons that he used in his attack.
Those weapons were two standard 9mm handguns — not, as the media tripped over itself prematurely to report, a much-maligned AR-15 “assault rifle.”
On his show last night, unrelenting bore Piers Morgan spent a great deal of time spreading misinformation about the role of the AR-15 in the shooting, a theme that the New York Daily News rather embarrassingly continued on its front page this morning. Although retractions will presumably be forthcoming in the usual tiny print, it is probably too late to remove completely the impression that the headlines will have left in the imaginations of many Americans.
You can read the rest of the piece via the below link:
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/358714/gun-controls-dead-end-charles-c-w-cooke
Note: The above photo was released by the FBI.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment