As I noted in my Washington
Times piece on the Philadelphia Starbucks incident, an open door policy on
restrooms will attract the homeless, drug addicts and the mentally ill, which
will put off paying customers.
Valerie Richardson at the
Washington Times offers a piece on Starbuck’s new liberal restroom policy.
With its decision to allow
the non-paying public unlimited access to its cafes, Starbucks may have traded
one grande problem for another.
The Seattle-based coffee
giant closed more than 8,000 shops for a half-day Tuesday to conduct
racial-bias training with 175,000 partners, or employees, absorbing an
estimated $12 million hit in response to the high-profile arrests of two black
men last month at a Philadelphia café.
While the workshop drew
skepticism — liberals noted that such one-day diversity exercises rarely change
behavior, and conservatives called the event a “reeducation camp” — the
long-term dilemma for Starbucks lies with how much leeway it’s willing to give
its non-paying customers.
The come-one, come-all policy
announced earlier this month arrived even as fast-food joints, libraries and
other public establishments have increasingly cut back access in order to avoid
becoming homeless havens and drug dens amid the opioid and heroin crisis.
“Do you really want to deal
with a mass of homeless people or whoever is in there — could be drug-addicted,
you don’t know — when you’re there with your kids?” asked NBC host Megyn Kelly
on her show Tuesday.
In reality, many Starbucks
stores, particularly those in suburban, residential and rural areas, have long
allowed non-paying customers to loiter and take advantage of the facilities,
but the other outlets often had a reason for their tighter policies — problems
with a disruptive clientele.
You can read the rest of the
piece via the below link:
You can also read my
Washington Times piece on Starbucks via the below link:
No comments:
Post a Comment