The U.S. Attorney’s Office Eastern District of Pennsylvania released the below statement of U.S. Attorney William McSwain.
PHILADELPHIA, PA – On Wednesday, December 23,
2020, U.S. District Court Judge Nitza I. Quinones Alejandro issued a Memorandum
Opinion on Plaintiff’s Motion for a Preliminary Injunction. Plaintiff
alleged that the City had an unconstitutional policy of treating protests more
favorably than other First Amendment-protected activity, such as parades.
While the Opinion denied the Plaintiff’s Motion, it did so on the basis that
the City has abandoned its policy.
I
want to congratulate the Philadelphia Vietnam Veterans Memorial Society for
successfully protecting the First Amendment rights of all Philadelphians.
Its lawsuit has achieved its purpose: the court has now confirmed that the City
has abandoned its policy of favoring protests over other constitutionally
protected speech, like parades.
The
U.S. Attorney’s Office first objected to the City’s policy back on July 22,
2020, when I wrote a letter to City Solicitor Marcel Pratt. In that
letter, I outlined the various unconstitutional aspects of the City’s July 14,
2020 Special Events Moratorium and explained how the City could not “pick and
choose” by banning parades or other First Amendment-protected activity while
simultaneously allowing and supporting protests. Unlike the City’s July
14, 2020 policy, the First Amendment does not discriminate.
Soon
thereafter, the Vietnam Veterans Memorial Society also objected to the City’s
policy. In response, the City “expressly rescinded the restrictions” in
the July 14, 2020 policy, as the court explained. Significantly,
organizations may now “hold a parade without a permit, on equal footing with
all other events, and without threat of being dispersed,” according to the
court.
Thus, any organization that wants to express a message via an outdoor parade in Philadelphia can have at it – the City cannot and will not stop you. And if the City attempts to return to the days of discriminating against certain types of speech, it will find itself right back in court.
No comments:
Post a Comment