The U.S. Justice Department released the below information:
A federal
grand jury in Tampa, Florida, returned a superseding indictment charging four
U.S. citizens and three Russian nationals with working on behalf of the Russian
government and in conjunction with the Russian Federal Security Service (FSB)
to conduct a multi-year foreign malign influence campaign in the United States.
Among other conduct, the superseding indictment alleges that the Russian
defendants recruited, funded and directed U.S. political groups to act as
unregistered illegal agents of the Russian government and sow discord and
spread pro-Russian propaganda; the indicted intelligence officers, in
particular, participated in covertly funding and directing candidates for local
office within the United States.
Additionally, in a separate case out of the District of
Columbia, a criminal complaint was unsealed charging Russian national Natalia
Burlinova with conspiring with an FSB officer to act as an illegal agent of
Russia in the United States.
“Russia’s foreign intelligence service allegedly weaponized our
First Amendment rights – freedoms Russia denies its own citizens – to divide
Americans and interfere in elections in the United States,” said Assistant
Attorney General Matthew G. Olsen of the Justice Department’s National Security
Division. “The department will not hesitate to expose and prosecute those who
sow discord and corrupt U.S. elections in service of hostile foreign interests,
regardless of whether the culprits are U.S. citizens or foreign individuals
abroad.”
“Efforts by the Russian government to secretly influence U.S.
elections will not be tolerated,” said Assistant Attorney General Kenneth A.
Polite, Jr. of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division. “As today’s
announcement demonstrates, the Criminal Division is committed to eradicating
foreign malign influence from the U.S. political system and helping ensure the
integrity of our elections.”
“Today’s announcement paints a harrowing picture of Russian
government actions and the lengths to which the FSB will go to interfere with
our elections, sow discord in our nation and ultimately recruit U.S citizens to
their efforts,” said Acting Assistant Director Kurt Ronnow of the FBI’s
Counterintelligence Division. “All Americans should be deeply concerned by the
tactics employed by the FSB and remain vigilant to any attempt to undermine our
democracy. The FBI remains committed to confronting this egregious behavior and
ultimately disrupting our adversaries and those who act on their behalf.”
United States v. Ionov, et al.
According to the superseding indictment returned in the Middle
District of Florida, Aleksandr Viktorovich Ionov, a resident of Moscow, was the
founder and president of the Anti-Globalization Movement of Russia (AGMR), an
organization headquartered in Moscow, Russia, and funded by the Russian
government. Ionov allegedly utilized AGMR to carry out Russia’s malign
influence campaign. Ionov’s influence efforts were allegedly directed and
supervised by Moscow-based FSB officers, including indicted defendants Aleksey
Borisovich Sukhodolov and Yegor Sergeyevich Popov.
“The prosecution of this criminal conduct is essential to
protecting the American public when foreign governments seek to inject
themselves into the American political process,” said U.S. Attorney Roger B.
Handberg for the Middle District of Florida. “We thank our partners at the FBI
for their tireless investigation of these events and their commitment to ensure
justice is done.”
Among other illegal activities, the superseding indictment
alleges that Ionov, Sukhodolov and Popov conspired to directly and
substantially influence democratic elections in the United States by
clandestinely funding and directing the political campaign of a particular
candidate for local office in St. Petersburg, Florida, in 2019. For instance,
the superseding indictment alleges that Popov expressly referred to this effort
on behalf of the FSB as “our election campaign,” and Ionov referring to the
candidate as the “candidate whom we supervise.” Ionov and Popov allegedly
intended that this election interference plot would extend beyond the 2019
local election cycle in St. Petersburg, and subsequently discussed that the
“USA Presidential election” was the FSB’s “main topic of the year.”
Moreover, from at least November 2014 until July 2022, Ionov
allegedly engaged in a years-long foreign malign influence campaign targeting
the United States. As a part of the campaign, Ionov allegedly recruited members
of political groups within the United States, including the African People’s
Socialist Party and the Uhuru Movement (collectively, the APSP) in Florida,
Black Hammer in Georgia and a political group in California (referred to in the
superseding indictment as U.S. Political Group 3), to participate in the
influence campaign and act as agents of Russia in the United States, including
the following indicted defendants:
- Omali Yeshitela, a
U.S. citizen residing in St. Petersburg, Florida, and St. Louis, Missouri,
who served as the chairman and founder of the APSP;
- Penny Joanne Hess,
a U.S. citizen residing in St. Petersburg, Florida, and St. Louis,
Missouri, who served as the leader of a component of the APSP;
- Jesse Nevel, a U.S.
citizen residing in St. Petersburg, Florida, and St. Louis, Missouri, who
served as a member of a component of the APSP; and
- Augustus C. Romain
Jr., aka Gazi Kodzo, a U.S. citizen residing in St. Petersburg, Florida,
and Atlanta, who served as a leader of the APSP and a founder of Black
Hammer in Georgia.
One focus of Ionov’s alleged influence operation was to create
the appearance of American popular support for Russia’s annexation of
territories in Ukraine. For example, in May 2020, Ionov allegedly sent a
request he stated was from “Russia, the Donetsk People’s Republic” – an
apparent reference to a Russian-occupied region in eastern Ukraine – to
Yeshitela and members of other U.S. political groups to make statements in
support of the independence of the so-called Donetsk People’s Republic, a
Russian-backed breakaway state in eastern Ukraine. Ionov later allegedly touted
to the FSB that Yeshitela’s video-recorded statement of support was the first
time that “American nonprofit organizations congratulated citizens” of the
occupied region.
Ionov’s use of the APSP to promote Russian propaganda relating
to Ukraine allegedly continued after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. On the day
Russia invaded Ukraine, Feb. 24, 2022, Ionov allegedly emailed Nevel an “URGENT
MESSAGE” which contained pro-Russian talking points in support of the invasion.
Thereafter, throughout March 2022, the APSP repeatedly hosted Ionov via video
conference to discuss the war, during which Ionov falsely stated that anyone
who supported Ukraine also supported Naziism and white supremacy, and Yeshitela
and another APSP member allegedly made statements of solidarity with the
Russian government.
Ionov, Sukhodolov, Popov, Yeshitela, Hess, Nevel and Romain are
charged with conspiring to have U.S. citizens act as illegal agents of the
Russian government within the United States without providing prior notification
to the Attorney General, as required by law. If convicted, they each face a
maximum penalty of five years in prison. Yeshitela, Hess and Nevel are also
charged with acting as agents of Russia within the United States without such
prior notification. If convicted, they each face a maximum penalty of 10 years
in prison. If convicted, a federal district court judge will determine any
sentence after considering the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory
factors.
Assistant U.S. Attorneys Daniel J. Marcet and Risha Asokan for
the Middle District of Florida, Trial Attorney Menno Goedman of the Justice
Department’s Counterintelligence and Export Control Section, and Trial Attorney
Demetrius Sumner of the Criminal Division’s Public Integrity Section are
prosecuting the case.
United States v. Burlinova
According to the affidavit in support of the criminal complaint
unsealed in the District of Columbia, Russian national Natalia Burlinova, a
resident of Moscow, conspired with an FSB officer to recruit U.S. citizens from
academic and research institutions to travel to Russia to participate in a
public diplomacy program called Meeting Russia. The program was operated by
PICREADI, a Russian organization led by Burlinova, funded by the Russian
government and devoted to promoting Russian national interests.
“The defendant is accused of subverting our foreign agent
notification laws to promote Russian national interests here in the United
States, concealing from the public that her recruitment efforts were funded by
a Russian security service,” said U.S. Attorney Matthew M. Graves for the
District of Columbia. “We will continue to expose these serious crimes and hold
all who perpetrate them accountable.”
The affidavit alleges that the FSB officer provided funding and
other support for Burlinova’s foreign recruitment and her efforts to advance
Russian interests in the United States. In return, Burlinova provided the FSB
officer with extensive information about U.S. citizens who were recruited to
attend her programs, including their résumés, passport information, photographs
and analyses of their views toward Russia. Burlinova further identified for the
FSB officer particular U.S. citizens who, in Burlinova’s view, had expressed
positive attitudes towards Russia and were prepared to continue to collaborate.
During a recruitment trip to the United States in fall 2018, Burlinova met with
U.S. citizens at various universities and research institutions and provided to
photographs of her meetings to the FSB officer. The FSB officer used the
information Burlinova provided prepare FSB intelligence reports. Burlinova
never notified the Attorney General of these efforts or otherwise disclosed to
the public that her recruitment efforts were supported and funded by a Russian security
service.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Michael J. Friedman for the District of
Columbia and Trial Attorney Emma D. Ellenrieder of the National Security
Division’s Counterintelligence and Export Control Section are prosecuting the
case.
An indictment and a complaint are merely an allegation. All defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.
No comments:
Post a Comment