Broad + Liberty posted my piece on the reality of convicted leaker Reality Winner.
You can read the
piece via the below link of the below text:
Paul Davis: The reality of convicted leaker Reality Winner (broadandliberty.com)
With former President Trump pleading not guilty to a 37-count indictment in court on Tuesday, June 13, many commentators have weighed in with their view of the historical and contentious upcoming trial, and reporters have reached out to numerous others for comment.
NBC News reached
out to Reality Winner, a former National Security Agency contractor and Air
Force veteran who was the first person prosecuted by the Trump administration
for leaking a top-secret document on Russian hacking to an internet publication.
She was subsequently convicted and sentenced to five years in federal prison.
Now out of
prison, Winner, 31, told an NBC reporter she was “blown away” by the Trump
indictment. “This is probably one of the most egregious and cut-and-dry cases,”
Winner, who is not a lawyer, told a reporter in a phone interview with NBC
News.
Even if Trump is
found guilty of all counts, his case is very different from Winner’s. She
released a classified document to The
Intercept, which in turn published the document as they received it, with
sensitive sources and methods attached.
Revealing sources
and methods have gotten people killed in the past.
Among other
charges, Trump is charged with willful retention of national defense
information, which is part of the Espionage Act. There is no evidence that
Trump released the classified information to the press or to a foreign nation.
Coincidentally, I
watched the HBO Max film “Reality,” which
is about the interrogation and subsequent arrest of Reality Winner, only days
before I read her comments on Trump’s case.
The film is
interesting, as it covers the 104-minute interrogation of the 25-year-old
translator by two FBI special agents in her home before they arrested her. The
FBI agents suspected Winner of having released a classified document about
Russian interference in the 2016 election to The
Intercept. Having known and interviewed many FBI agents, I found their
portrayal to be believable and fair.
The film is based
on writer-director Tina Satter’s 2019 play “This is a Room,” which like the
film, features dialogue pulled directly from the transcript of the FBI
interrogation of Winner.
The film and the good actress who
portrayed Reality Winner almost made me feel sorry for her.
Almost.
Having spent a
good part of my life protecting classified information and briefing, debriefing
and training others on protecting classified information, first as a young
sailor in the U.S. Navy and later as a civilian Defense Department employee, I
felt that Reality Winner got what she deserved.
I followed the
Winner case closely as it unfolded. Winner, a former U.S. Air Force translator,
was employed as a National Security Agency contractor in May 2017 when she
decided to print out a classified document and sneak it out of the federal
building in Georgia. She then mailed the classified document to The Intercept. Winner later said she was
motivated as she believed the American people were being misled. She said she
meant no harm.
Intelligence is a
complicated business, and no military, Defense Department civilian employee, or
contractor has the right to decide what classified information can be released
to the press and the public, unless they have the proper declassification
authority to do so.
When I was an eighteen-year-old sailor serving on an aircraft carrier off the coast of North Vietnam in 1970 and 1971, I had a top-secret security clearance and I handled highly sensitive wartime messages. Like many senior and junior military people at the time, I didn’t agree with the way the Vietnam War was being conducted, with restricted rules of engagement, a war of attrition with the enemy and the containment of the communist North Vietnamese Army. Like many of the military people I served with, I felt we should go all out and win the war, using the massive air power of the aircraft carrier and other military means.
But my strong
personal views did not propel me to take a seabag full of classified documents
off the warship at Hong Kong or other ports of call and sell them, like Michael
Walker (son of Navy spy John Walker) did in 1985, or release them to the press,
like Reality Winner did in 2017.
Reality Winner
was sentenced to five years and three months in prison on August 23, 2018.
“This defendant
used her position of trust to steal and divulge closely guarded intelligence
information,” said U.S. Attorney Bobby L. Christine at the time of the
sentencing. “Her betrayal of the United States put at risk sources and methods
of intelligence gathering, thereby offering advantage to our adversaries.”
“When obtaining
Top Secret clearance as a government employee or contractor, the handling of
top-secret information is clearly spelled out along with the ramifications of
mishandling such information,” added Special Agent in Charge of the Atlanta
Filed Office J.C. Hacker. “Revealing sources and methods to the advantage of
our adversaries and to the detriment of our country will never be acceptable.”
While others may
regard classified leakers like Reality Winner, former NSA contractor Edward
Snowden, and former Army Private Manning as heroic whistleblowers, I regard
them as criminals who recklessly endangered American lives and national
security.
Paul Davis, a Philadelphia writer and frequent contributor to Broad + Liberty, also contributes to Counterterrorism magazine and writes the On Crime column for the Washington Times.
No comments:
Post a Comment